4.6 Article

Weekly docetaxel and prednisolone versus prednisolone alone in androgen-independent prostate cancer: A randomized phase II study

Journal

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages 1691-1699

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.01.104

Keywords

androgen-independent; prostate cancer; prednisolone; prostate-specific antigen; response; survival; taxotere

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Due to its palliative effect and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease, many clinicians have considered prednisolone monotherapy to be the standard systemic treatment in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer (AIPC). This approach should be compared with docetaxel (Taxotere) + prednisolone. Methods: A total of 109 eligible patients were entered into a randomized phase II study (arm A: Taxotere + prednisolone [30 mg m(-2) weekly during 5 of 6 wk + prednisolone 5 mg x 2 per os daily]; arm B: prednisolone [5 mg x 2 per os daily]). Biochemical response (confirmed >= 50% PSA reduction of the baseline level at 6 wk) was the primary endpoint with subjective progression, quality of life, and progression-free and overall survival as secondary outcomes. Results: Biochemical response at 6 wk was recorded in 29 of 54 evaluable patients in arm A (54%; 95% Cl: 40-67%) and 13 of 50 patients in arm B (26%; 95% Cl: 14-38%), with similar response rates at 12 wk and if based on all eligible patients. Median progression-free survival was 11 mo (95% Cl: 5.8-16.2 mo) in arm A and 4 mo in arm B (95% CI: 2.4-5.6 mo). Median overall survival was 27 mo in arm A (95% Cl: 19.8-34.1 mo) and 18 mo in arm B (95% CI: 15.2-20.8 mo). Pain relief and quality-of-life assessment indicated superiority of the arm A treatment, without unacceptable toxicity. Conclusion: Docetaxel + prednisolone should become the first-line systemic standard treatment for AIPC as a more effective treatment than prednisolone monotherapy. Weekly applications of docetaxel are well tolerated. (c) 2007 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available