4.2 Article

Porphyry Cu-Mo deposits in the eastern Xing'an-Mongolian Orogenic Belt: Mineralization ages and their geodynamic implications

Journal

CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN
Volume 52, Issue 24, Pages 3416-3427

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-007-0466-8

Keywords

Xing-Meng Orogenic Belt; porphyry Cu-Mo deposit; zircon U-Pb dating; geodynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The eastern Xing'an-Mongolian (Xing-Meng) Orogenic Belt (XMOB) is one of the important areas of porphyry copper (Cu)-molybdenum (Mo) deposits in China. However, studies on the exact ages of mineralization and their geodynamic significance are very limited. In this study, granodioritic rocks from the Duobaoshan Cu deposit and Daheishan Mo deposit were selected to make zircon SHRIMP U-Pb analyses in order to constrain their mineralization ages. Geochronological data indicate that two episodes of mineralization took place in the Duobaoshan Cu deposits. The granodiorite related to the Duobaoshan porphyry Cu deposit was formed in the Early Paleozoic with zircon U-Pb age of 485 +/- 8 Ma, whereas the granodiorites related to the Sankuanggou skarn-type Cu deposit were emplaced in the Jurassic with zircon U-Pb ages of 176 +/- 3 and 177 +/- 3 Ma. In the Daheishan area of Jilin Province, the emplacement age of the granodiorite porphyry related to the porphyry Mo deposit was dated at 170 +/- 3 Ma, and the unmineralized monzogranite at 178 +/- 3 Ma. Therefore, two episodes of Cu-Mo mineralization were developed in the eastern XMOB, at similar to 485 Ma and similar to 175 Ma, respectively. Based on the geological history and spatial-temporal distribution of the granitoids in northeastern (NE) China, it is proposed that the Duobaoshan Cu deposit was related to the collision of the Xing'an and Erguna blocks in the Early Paleozoic, and the Sankuanggou Cu and Daheishan Mo deposits were related to subduction of the Paleo-Pacific plate during the Jurassic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available