4.7 Article

Protein aggregation and proteasome dysfunction after brain ischemia

Journal

STROKE
Volume 38, Issue 12, Pages 3230-3236

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.487108

Keywords

brain ischemia/reperfusion; delayed neuronal death; protein aggregation; protein misfolding; proteosomes; ubiquitin; size-exclusion chromatography

Funding

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS036810, R01 NS040407-08, NS36810, R01 NS040407, R56 NS036810, NS040407, R29 NS036810] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose-Protein unfolding and aggregation are dominant early pathogenic events in neurons after brain ischemia. This study used a transient cerebral ischemia model to investigate whether overproduction of unfolded proteins after brain ischemia is a consequence of proteasome dysfunction. Methods-Proteasome peptidase activity and proteasome subcellular redistribution and assembly were studied by peptidase activity assay, Western blot analysis, and size-exclusion chromatography. Results-Proteasome peptidase activity, as determined with the peptide substrate succinyl-LLVY-7-amino-4-methylcoumarin, was moderately decreased, and the 26S proteasome was disassembled during the early period of reperfusion after transient brain ischemia. Furthermore, the proteasome subunits, particularly the 19S components, were deposited into the protein aggregate-containing fraction after an episode of transient cerebral ischemia. Conclusions-These results clearly demonstrate that after an episode of brain ischemia, proteasomes are disassembled and aggregated and thus fail to function normally. Deposition of proteasomes into protein aggregates may also indicate that proteasomes attempt to degrade ubiquitin-conjugated proteins (ubiproteins) overproduced after brain ischemia. However, ubiproteins are too numerous to be degraded and trap some of the proteasomes into their aggregates after brain ischemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available