4.5 Review

ISFG: Recommendations on biostatistics in paternity testing

Journal

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS
Volume 1, Issue 3-4, Pages 223-231

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2007.06.006

Keywords

Recommendations; Paternity testing; Immigration testing; Relationship testing; DNA investigations; Genetic testing; Biostatistics; Paternity index (PI); Likelihood ratio; International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG); Paternity Testing Commission (PTC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Paternity Testing Commission (PTC) of the International Society for Forensic Genetics has taken up the task of establishing the biostatistical recommendations in accordance with the ISO 17025 standards and it previous set of ISFG recommendations specific to the genetic investigations in paternity cases. In the initial set, the PTC recommended that biostatistical evaluations of paternity are based on a likelihood ratio principle - yielding the paternity index, PI. Here, we have made five supplementary biostatistical recommendations. The first recommendation clarifies and defines basic concepts of genetic hypotheses and calculation concerns needed to produce valid Pis. The second and third recommendations address issues associated With Population genetics (allele probabilities, Y-chromosome markers, mtDNA, and population substructuring) and special circumstances (deficiency/reconstruction and immigration cases), respectively. The fourth recommendation considers strategies regarding genetic evidence against paternity. The fifth recommendation covers necessary documentation, reporting details and assumptions underlying calculations. The PTC strongly suggests that these recommendations should be adopted by all laboratories involved in paternity testing as the basis for their biostatistical analysis. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available