4.7 Article

COSMOSOMAS observations of the cosmic microwave background and Galactic foregrounds at 11 GHz:: evidence for anomalous microwave emission at high Galactic latitude

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 382, Issue 2, Pages 594-608

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12380.x

Keywords

cosmic microwave background; cosmology : observations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present observations with the new 11-GHz radiometer of the COSMOSOMAS experiment at the Teide Observatory (Tenerife). The sky region between 0 degrees <= RA <= 360 degrees and 26 degrees <= Dec. <= 49 degrees (ca. 6500 deg(2)) was observed with an angular resolution of 0 degrees.9. Two orthogonal independent channels in the receiving system measured total power signals from linear polarizations with a 2-GHz bandwidth. Maps with an average sensitivity of 50 mu K per beam have been obtained for each channel. At high Galactic latitude (|b| > 30 degrees) the 11-GHz data are found to contain the expected cosmic microwave background (CMB) as well as extragalactic radiosources, galactic synchrotron and free-free emission, and a dust-correlated component which is likely of Galactic origin. At the angular scales allowed by the window function of the experiment, the 100-240 mu m dust-correlated component presents an amplitude Delta T similar to 9-13 mu K while the CMB signal is of the order of 27 mu K. The spectral behaviour of the dust-correlated signal is examined in the light of previous COSMOSOMAS data at 13-17 GHz and Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe data at 22-94 GHz in the same sky region. We detect a flattening in the spectral index of this signal below 20 GHz which rules out synchrotron radiation as being responsible for the emission. This anomalous dust emission can be described by a combination of free-free emission and spinning dust models with a flux density peaking around 20 GHz.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available