4.5 Article

Mapping elasticity in human lenses using bubble-based acoustic radiation force

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages 890-893

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2007.09.006

Keywords

lens; accommodation; presbyopia; acoustic radiation force; mechanical properties; ultrasound

Categories

Funding

  1. NEI NIH HHS [R21 EY015876-02, R21 EY015876-01A1, R21 EY015876, EY015876] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIBIB NIH HHS [R21 EB003449, EB003449] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study uses acoustic radiation pressure to displace a femtosecond laser-produced bubble in human lens tissue. Bubble displacement is monitored with low-amplitude, high-resolution ultrasound. Displacements are compensated by bubble size determined from ultrasonic backscatter. The Young's modulus is proportional to the inverse of the compensated displacement with the constant of proportionality determined from similar measurements in a controlled gelatin sample. Multiple measurements were obtained on 12 human lens specimens grouped into two age categories, middle-age (about 40 years old) and old-age (63-70 years old). There were 3 lenses from 2 donors in the middle-age group and 9 lenses from 5 donors in the old-age group. At each radial position, the median value was computed for all measurements within each group. For middle-age lenses, Young's modulus ranged from 5.2 kPa in the center to 1.1 kPa on the periphery. For old-age lenses, Young's modulus ranged from 10.6 kPa in the center to 1.4 kPa on the periphery. These values are the same order of magnitude as previous measurements using other techniques. The age related change in elasticity distribution is also similar to a previous study. Radially varying elasticity may provide insight into the mechanics of accommodation. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available