4.5 Article

The H2O-D2O solvent isotope effects on the molar volumes of alkali-chloride solutions at T=(288.1-5, 298.15, and 308.15) K

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS
Volume 39, Issue 12, Pages 1589-1600

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2007.05.002

Keywords

molar volume isotope effect; D2O-solvent isotope effect; ionic hydration; ionic molar volume; unique Li+-hydration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Densities of LiCl, NaCl, KCl, and CsCl in normal and heavy water solutions have been measured using a vibrating-tube densitometer with (1-2) . 10(-6) precision at T = (288.15, 298.15, and 308.15) K over a wide concentration range from (0. 1 to 5) molal, m. Solvent isotope effects (IE) on apparent molar volumes, as well as both on solute- and solvent-partial molar volumes were evaluated to establish their trend with cationic size in a systematic way. With the exception of the LiCl, both the normal standard IEs, ((V) over bar degrees(2), (H) > (V) over bar degrees(2)(D)), and the inverse excess IEs of the solutes, ((V) over bar (cx)(2)(D) > (V) over bar (cx)(2) (H)), increase linearly with the electrostriction effect of the cations (1/r(ion)), while with increasing temperature and/or concentration, the excess effects become almost the same. In contrast to the solute excess IEs, which show linear m(1/2) -dependence over the whole concentration range, except for LiCl, the inverse excess IEs of the solvent, ((V) over bar (cx)(1) (D) > (V)over bar>(cx)(1) (H)), hardly change over the lower concentration range (Delta(V) over bar (cx)(1) congruent to Delta(V) over bar degrees(1), m <= 1). How ever, with further increase of the concentration, these IEs significantly decrease. Individual ionic standard and excess volume contributions are derived and the results are discussed in terms of structural concepts of ionic hydration. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available