4.6 Article

Pharyngeal swallowing: Defining pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter relationships in human neonates

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS
Volume 151, Issue 6, Pages 597-603

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.042

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK068158-02, R01 DK 068158, R01 DK068158, R01 DK068158-01A2] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To test the hypothesis that the sensorimotor characteristics of the reflexes evoked on stimulation with air and water infusions differ by studying the effect of pharyngeal stimulation on pharyngeal-upper esopliageal sphincter (UES) interactions in healthy neonates. Study design Pharyngo-UES-esophageal manometry was recorded in 10 neonates at 39 +/- 4 weeks postmenstrual age. Pharyngeal infusions (n = 155) of air (0.1 to 2.0 mL) and sterile water (0.1 to 0.5 mL) were given. Two types of reflexes were recognized: pharyngeal reflexive swallowing (PRS) and pharyngo-UES-contractile reflex (PUCR). Frequency occurrence, distribution of reflexes, threshold volume, response time, and stimulus-response relationship were evaluated. Results The reflex response rates were 30% for air and 76% for water (P <.001). PRS was more frequent than PUCR with air and water (P <.05), even though the stimulation thresholds and response latencies were similar. Graded volumes of water but not air resulted in an increased frequency of PRS (P <.01). Conclusions PRS is more frequent than PUCR, and the 2 reflexes have distinctive characteristics in air and water stimuli. Both PRS and PUCR have implications for the evaluation of swallowing in infants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available