4.6 Article

Gross and Pathologic analysis of long-term silicone implants inserted into the human body for augmentation rhinoplasty: 221 revision cases

Journal

PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
Volume 120, Issue 7, Pages 1997-2003

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000287323.71630.e6

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In augmentation rhinoplasty, delayed morphologic changes are often observed with silicone implants, despite them being known as a safe implant material. The purpose of this study was to identify the cause and time course of delayed shape changes of silicone implants, through the long-term evaluation of inserted implants and their surrounding nasal soft tissues after. their removal at revision rhinoplasty operations. Methods: Two hundred twenty-one silicone implants removed during revision rhinoplasty were studied. The period of insertion ranged from I month to 25 years, with an average of 6 years 7 months. Calcification within the silicone implants and, when available, the capsular soft-tissue attachments were examined with the naked eye and light microscopy. Results: Calcification was first observed grossly with the naked eye after 5 years 8 months of insertion. With light microscopy, calcification debris could be seen after 4 years. After implant insertion for more than 9 years, focal calcification could be seen in 50 percent of implants. When implants had been inserted for more than 15 years, a denatured type of large calcification was clearly observed. Plasma cell, macrophage, and neutrophil proliferation was noted in the soft-tissue capsule surrounding the superficial calcifications in those individuals with an early inflammatory response, and lymphocyte proliferation was noted in those with a late inflammatory response. Conclusions: Silicone implants were noted to induce calcification when inserted for a long time, causing long-term morphologic changes. This should be taken into consideration when choosing silicone implants for augmentation rhinoplasty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available