4.7 Article

Phase I/II study of immunotherapy using autologous tumor lysate-pulsed dendritic cells in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Journal

CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages 257-267

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2007.07.014

Keywords

renal cell carcinoma; dendritic cell; tumor lysate; immunotherapy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This phase I/II study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of immunotherapy using tumor lysate (TL)-pulsed dendritic cells (DC) in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). DC were generated by culturing peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4 and were pulsed with autologous TL and keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). Maturation of DC was induced by a combined treatment of CD40 ligand, IFN and monocyte-conditioned medium. The patients were administered two cycles of TL-pulsed DCs vaccination, each of which comprised of four doses injected subcutaneously at biweekly intervals. Nine patients were included. The immunotherapy was well tolerated without severe side effects. One patient achieved an objective partial response (PR). Five patients showed stable disease (SD), and the remaining three had progressive disease (PD). With a median follow-up of 17.5 months, the median time to progression was 5.2 months and the median overall survival was 29 months. In the antigen-specific lymphocyte proliferation assay, eight patients showed a proliferative response, which tended to be stronger in patients with SD or PR than in patients with PD. The ELISPOT assay was performed in two patients and indicated that one patient with PR showed a much stronger response than another with PD. Our results suggest that TL-pulsed DC immunotherapy in combination with nephrectomy affect the natural course of RCC and are associated with clinical benefits for patients with metastatic diseases. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available