4.3 Article

Polymicrobial bloodstream infections involving Candida species:: analysis of patients and review of the literature

Journal

DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Volume 59, Issue 4, Pages 401-406

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.07.001

Keywords

candidemia; Candida; blood culture; polymicrobial blood culture; polymicrobial candidemia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Candida species are the 4th most common cause of nosocomial bloodstream infections in North America. It is not widely appreciated, however, that many of these infections are polymicrobial, that is, that bacteria and occasionally more than 1 species of Candida are present in the sarne blood culture bottle. Analysis of 2 groups of candidemic patients and a review of the literature were performed. Review of 141 candidemic patients from 8 Veterans Affairs hospitals and 231 patients from a tertiary care hospital with transplant services was performed. Of the 372 patients with candidemia, 100 (27%) had polymicrobial blood cultures: 88 patients (24%) had synchronous bacteremia and 12 patients (3%) had more than 1 species of Candida. One hundred bacteria were isolated from these patients, 69 were Gram positive, and 31 were Grain negative. Candidemia was shown to occur in a setting of polymicrobial bacteremia, extending over days, whereas Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus were less frequently associated with polymicrobial bloodstream infections. Review of more than 8000 reported episodes of candidemia revealed high rates of polymicrobial infection occurring with candidemia. Of blood cultures isolating Candida, 23% were polymicrobial and 4% had more than 1 species of Candida. Thus, almost 1 in 4 patients with candidemia will have a polymicrobial bloodstream infection. As detection of bloodborne infections evolves toward nonculture methodologies, documentation of the frequency of polymicrobial bloodstream infections involving Candida is important. This finding may have treatment implications for clinicians. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available