4.6 Article

Reduction of HIV Persistence Following Transplantation in HIV- Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 1136-1141

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12699

Keywords

Human immunodeficiency virus; kidney transplantation; sirolimus

Funding

  1. NIAID [AI052748, AI087415]
  2. K24 [AI069994, U19 AI096109]
  3. University of California, San Francisco

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic inflammation may contribute to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) persistence through a number of potential pathways. We explored the impact of immunosuppressant therapy on peripheral blood measures of HIV persistence following kidney transplantation. Stored plasma and peripheral blood mononuclear cells prior to transplantation and at weeks 12, 26, 52 and 104 posttransplant were obtained from 91 transplant recipients. In a multivariate model, higher pretransplant plasma HIV RNA level (p<0.0001) and a longer duration of follow-up posttransplant (p=0.09) were associated with higher posttransplant plasma HIV RNA levels. A higher baseline HIV DNA (p<0.0001) was significantly associated with higher HIV DNA levels posttransplant, while higher CD4+ T cell count (p=0.001), sirolimus use (p=0.04) and a longer duration of follow-up (p=0.06) were associated with lower posttransplant HIV DNA levels. The association between sirolimus exposure and lower frequency of cells containing HIV DNA levels posttransplant suggest that the immune-modifying drugs may affect the level of HIV persistence during effect therapy. Future studies of sirolimus as a reservoir-modifying agent are warranted. This study reports an association between sirolimus exposure and a lower frequency of CD4 lymphocytes containing HIV DNA, suggesting that immunosuppression required for kidney transplantation in the HIV-infected recipient may impact the level of HIV persistence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available