4.4 Article

Helicobacter pylori in the palatine tonsils of patients with IgA nephropathy compared with those of patients with recurrent pharyngotonsillitis

Journal

HUMAN PATHOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 12, Pages 1788-1797

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.04.012

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori; coccoid form; tonsil; IgA nephropathy; immunohistochemistry

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Helicobacter pylori infection is acquired by oral ingestion. However, the morphology and microscopic localization of H pylori in the human oral cavity and pharynx are unknown. In the present study, we performed immunohistochemistry, immunoelectron microscopy, in situ hybridization, and polymerase chain reaction to identify H pylori in the palatine tonsils of 32 patients with immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) and 141 patients with recurrent pharyngotonsillitis (RPT). H pylori in coccoid form was present in bacterial colonies and horny layers of the stratified squamous epithelium in tonsillar crypts. We described for the first time the morphology of H pylori in palatine tonsils. Most bacterial colonies were sulfur granules with Actinomyces israelii (A israelii), and A israelii showed significant coexistence with H pylori (P = .011). The prevalence of H pylori in palatine tonsils of the RPT group increased steeply with age, but one fourth of the patients were found not to have tonsillar H pylori in adulthood. All patients with IgAN had H pylori in palatine tonsils. The prevalence of H pylori was greater in the IgAN group than in the RPT group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < .001). In contrast, A israelii was unrelated to age and clinical diagnosis (P = .722). In conclusion, our results demonstrate that H pylori in coccoid form is present in palatine tonsils and may indicate that H pylori in palatine tonsils is among the antigens causative of IgAN. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available