4.7 Article

Constraining the type Ia supernova progenitor: The search for hydrogen in nebular spectra

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 670, Issue 2, Pages 1275-1282

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/522367

Keywords

binaries : symbiotic; circumstellar matter; supernovae : general; supernovae : individual (SN 2005am, SN 2005cf); white dwarfs

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite intense scrutiny, the progenitor system(s) that gives rise to Type Ia supernovae remains unknown. The favored theory invokes a carbon-oxygen white dwarf accreting hydrogen-rich material from a close companion until a thermonuclear runaway ensues that incinerates the white dwarf. However, simulations resulting from this single-degenerate, binary channel demand the presence of low-velocity H alpha emission in spectra taken during the late nebular phase, since a portion of the companion's envelope becomes entrained in the ejecta. This hydrogen has never been detected, but has only rarely been sought. Here we present results from a campaign to obtain deep, nebular-phase spectroscopy of nearby Type Ia supernovae, and include multiepoch observations of two events: SN 2005am (slightly subluminous) and SN 2005cf (normally bright). No H alpha emission is detected in the spectra of either object. An upper limit of 0.01 M(circle dot) of solar abundance material in the ejecta is established from the models of Mattila et al., which, when coupled with the mass-stripping simulations of Marietta et al. and Meng et al., effectively rules out progenitor systems for these supernovae with secondaries close enough to the white dwarf to be experiencing Roche lobe overflow at the time of explosion. Alternative explanations for the absence of H alpha emission, along with suggestions for future investigations necessary to confidently exclude them as possibilities, are critically evaluated.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available