4.6 Article

Regulatory Dendritic Cell Infusion Prolongs Kidney Allograft Survival in Nonhuman Primates

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages 1989-2005

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.12310

Keywords

Costimulation blockade; dendritic cells; memory; rapamycin; renal transplant; rhesus macaques

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01 AI051698]
  2. Starzl Transplantation Institute Joseph A. Patrick Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined the influence of regulatory dendritic cells (DCreg), generated from cytokine-mobilized donor blood monocytes in vitamin D3 and IL-10, on renal allograft survival in a clinically relevant rhesusmacaque model. DCreg expressed low MHC class II and costimulatory molecules, but comparatively high levels of programmed death ligand-1 (B7-H1), andwere resistant to pro-inflammatory cytokine-induced maturation. They were infused intravenously (3.5-10 x 10(6) /kg), together with the B7-CD28 costimulation blocking agent CTLA4Ig, 7 days before renal transplantation. CTLA4Ig was given for up to 8 weeks and rapamycin, started on Day -2, was maintained with tapering of blood levels until full withdrawal at 6 months. Median graft survival time was 39.5 days in control monkeys (no DC infusion; n = 6) and 113.5 days (p < 0.05) in DCreg-treated animals (n = 6). No adverse events were associated with DCreg infusion, and there was no evidence of induction of host sensitization based on circulating donor-specific alloantibody levels. Immunologic monitoring also revealed regulation of donorreactive memory CD95_ T cells and reduced memory/regulatory T cell ratios in DCreg-treated monkeys compared with controls. Termination allograft histology showed moderate combined T cell-and Ab-mediated rejection in both groups. These findings justify further preclinical evaluation of DCreg therapy and their therapeutic potential in organ transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available