4.6 Article

Multi-line (sub)millimetre observations of the high-mass proto cluster IRAS 05358+3543

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 475, Issue 3, Pages 925-939

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077977

Keywords

stars : formation; stars : early type; stars : individual : IRAS 05358+3543; ISM : molecules

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Since most high-and intermediate-mass protostars are at great distance and form in clusters, high linear resolution observations are needed to investigate their physical properties. Aims. To study the gas in the innermost region around the protostars in the proto-cluster IRAS 05358+3543, we observed the source in several transitions of methanol and other molecular species with the Plateau de Bure Interferometer and the Submillimeter Array, reaching a linear resolution of 1100 AU. Methods. We determine the kinetic temperature of the gas around the protostars through an LVG and LTE analysis of their molecular emission; the column densities of CH3OH, CH3CN and SO2 are also derived. Constraints on the density of the gas are estimated for two of the protostellar cores. Results. We find that the dust condensations are in various evolutionary stages. The powerhouse of the cluster, mm1a, harbours a hot core with T similar to 220 (75 < T < 330) K. A double-peaked profile is detected in several transitions toward mm1a, and we found a velocity gradient along a linear structure which could be perpendicular to one of the outflows from the vicinity of mm1a. Since the size of the double-peaked emission is less than 1100 AU, we suggest that mm1a might host a massive circumstellar disk. The other sources are in earlier stages of star formation. The least active source, mm3, could be a starless massive core, since it is cold ( T < 20 K), with a large reservoir of accreting material ( M similar to 19 M-circle dot), but no molecular emission peaks on it.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available