4.6 Article

Complete Steroid Avoidance Is Effective and Safe in Children With Renal Transplants: A Multicenter Randomized Trial With Three-Year Follow-Up

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages 2719-2729

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04145.x

Keywords

Corticosteroids; graft function; growth; kidney transplantation; pediatric; side effects

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, made as a component of the Cooperative Clinical Trials in Pediatric Transplantation Consortium [AI-055795]
  2. Astellas
  3. Roche Pharmaceuticals

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine whether steroid avoidance in pediatric kidney transplantation is safe and efficacious, a randomized, multicenter trial was performed in 12 pediatric kidney transplant centers. One hundred thirty children receiving primary kidney transplants were randomized to steroid-free (SF) or steroid-based (SB) immunosuppression, with concomitant tacrolimus, mycophenolate and standard dose daclizumab (SB group) or extended dose daclizumab (SF group). Follow-up was 3 years posttransplant. Standardized height Z-score change after 3 years follow-up was 0.99 +/- 2.20 in SF versus 0.93 +/- 1.11 in SB; p = 0.825. In subgroup analysis, recipients under 5 years of age showed improved linear growth with SF compared to SB treatment (change in standardized height Z-score at 3 years 0.43 +/- 1.15 vs. 1.07 +/- 1.14; p = 0.019). There were no differences in the rates of biopsy-proven acute rejection at 3 years after transplantation (16.7% in SF vs. 17.1% in SB; p = 0.94). Patient survival was 100% in both arms; graft survival was 95% in the SF and 90% in the SB arms (p = 0.30) at 3 years follow-up. Over the 3 year follow-up period, the SF group showed lower systolic BP (p = 0.017) and lower cholesterol levels (p = 0.034). In conclusion, complete steroid avoidance is safe and effective in unsensitized children receiving primary kidney transplants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available