4.6 Article

The UV-optical galaxy color-magnitude diagram. III. Constraints on evolution from the blue to the red sequence

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 173, Issue 2, Pages 342-356

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/516639

Keywords

galaxies : evolution; ultraviolet : galaxies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We introduce a new quantity, the mass flux density of galaxies evolving from the blue sequence to the red sequence. We propose a simple technique for constraining this mass flux using the volume-corrected number density in the extinction-corrected UV-optical color-magnitude distribution, the stellar age indexes H delta(A) and D-n(4000), and a simple prescription for spectral evolution using a quenched star formation history. We exploit the excellent separation of red and blue sequences in the NUV-r band Hess function. The final value we measure, <(rho)over dot>(T) = 0.033 M-circle dot yr(-1) Mpc(-3), is strictly speaking an upper limit due to the possible contributions of bursting, composite, and extincted galaxies. However, it compares favorably with estimates of the average mass flux that we make based on the red luminosity function evolution derived from the DEEP2 and COMBO-17 surveys,<(rho)over dot>(R) = +0.034 M-circle dot yr(-1) Mpc(-3). We find that the blue sequence mass has remained roughly constant since z 1 (<(rho)over dot>B similar or equal to 0.01M(circle dot) yr(-1) Mpc(-3), but the average on- going star formation of <(rho)over dot>(SF) similar or equal to 0.037M(circle dot) yr(-1) Mpc(-3) over 0 < z < 1 is balanced by mass flux off the blue sequence. We explore the nature of the galaxies in the transition zone with particular attention to the frequency and impact of active galactic nuclei (AGNs). The AGN fraction peaks in the transition zone. We find circumstantial, albeit weak evidence that the quench rates are higher in higher luminosity AGNs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available