4.6 Article

Early Hospital Readmission After Kidney Transplantation: Patient and Center-Level Associations

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages 3283-3288

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04285.x

Keywords

Hospital readmission; kidney transplant

Funding

  1. Health Resources and Services Administration [234-2005-370011C]
  2. National Kidney Foundation of Maryland
  3. NIH [K23AG032885, R21DK085409]
  4. American Federation of Aging Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early hospital readmission (EHR) is associated with increased morbidity, costs and transition-of-care errors. We sought to quantify rates of and risk factors for EHR after kidney transplantation (KT). We studied 32 961 Medicare primary KT recipients (20002005) linked to Medicare claims through the United States Renal Data System. EHR was defined as at least one hospitalization within 30 days of initial discharge after KT. The association between EHR and recipient and transplant factors was explored using Poisson regression; hierarchical modeling was used to account for study center-level differences. The overall EHR rate was 31%, and 19 independent patient-level factors associated with EHR were identified: recipient factors included older age, African American race and various comorbidities; transplant factors included ECD, length of stay and lack of induction therapy. The unadjusted rate of EHR by center ranged from 18% to 47%, but conventional center-level factors (percent African American, percent age > 60, percent deceased donor and percent expanded criteria donor) were not associated with EHR. However, intermediate total volume and average length of stay were associated with increased EHR risk. Better identification of patients at risk for early hospital readmission following KT may guide discharge planning and early posttransplant outpatient monitoring.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available