4.6 Article

Voltage is a partial activator of rat thermosensitive TRP channels

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
Volume 585, Issue 2, Pages 469-482

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.144287

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI054450, AI054450] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS055023, NS055023] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TRPV1 and TRPM8 are sensory nerve ion channels activated by heating and cooling, respectively. A variety of physical and chemical stimuli activate these receptors in a synergistic manner but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Both channels are voltage sensitive, and temperature and ligands modulate this voltage dependence. Thus, a voltage-sensing mechanism has become an attractive model to explain the generalized gating of these and other thermo-sensitive TRP channels. We show here using whole-cell and single channel measurements that voltage produces only a partial activation of TRPV1 and TRPM8. At room temperature (20-25 degrees C) membrane depolarization evokes responses that saturate at similar to 50-60% of the maximum open probability. Furthermore, high concentrations of capsaicin (10 mu M), resiniferatoxin (5 mu M) and menthol (6 mM) reveal voltage-independent gating. Similarly, other modes of TRPV1 regulation including heat, protein kinase C-dependent phosphorylation, and protons enhance both the efficacy and sensitivity of voltage activation. In contrast, the TRPV1 antagonist capsazepine produces the opposite effects. These data can be explained by an allosteric model in which voltage, temperature, agonists and inverse agonists are independently coupled, either positively or negatively, to channel gating. Thus, voltage acts separately but in concert with other stimuli to regulate channel activation, and, therefore, a voltage-sensitive mechanism is unlikely to represent a final, gating mechanism for these channels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available