Journal
FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 88, Issue 6, Pages 1568-1572Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.037
Keywords
endometriosis; infertility; IVF-ET; ovarian reserve; implantation; pregnancy
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: To investigate the response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and ART outcomes in women with advanced-stage endometriosis and previous surgeries at the Yale IVF program between 1996 and 2002. Design: Retrospective case control study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): The study group consisted of 68 women who previously undergone laparoscopic surgery for advanced-stage endometriosis. The control group included 106 women with tubal-factor infertility. The women with endometriosis underwent 133 IVF-ET cycles and the control group 208 cycles. Intervention(s): Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and IVF-ET. Main Outcome Measure(S): Response to gonadotropins, fertilization, cleavage, implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates. Result(S): Lower peak E-2 levels, higher total gonadotropin requirements, lower oocyte yield, and higher cancellation rates were found in women with endometriosis compared with tubal-factor control subjects. However, no differences were found in fertilization, cleavage, implantation, pregnancy, miscarriage, and delivery rates between the endometriosis and tubal-factor groups. Conclusion(s)(S): Women with advanced-stage endometriosis who have undergone previous surgery respond less well to gonadotropins than women with tubal-factor infertility. However, implantation, pregnancy, and delivery rates are similar, suggesting that embryo quality and uterine receptivity remains unaffected despite diminished ovarian reserve in women with endometriosis. (Fertil Steril((R)) 2007;88:1568-72. (c) 2007 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available