4.4 Article

Involving consumers successfully in NHS research: a national survey

Journal

HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 380-391

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00457.x

Keywords

consumer; consumer; involvement; NHS research; survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives To investigate how far and in what way consumers are involved in NHS research. BackgroundThere is guidance from the UK Department of Health on involving consumers in research, but it is not known how these policies have been implemented. Design A national postal survey was conducted of 884 researchers selected randomly from the National Research Register, 16 researchers registered on the INVOLVE database and 15 consumers nominated by researchers who collaborated in the same research projects. Setting The survey participants were drawn from diverse settings including NHS organizations and universities. Participants Researchers and consumers collaborating in the same projects. Main outcome measures Details of how consumers were involved and the number of projects that met previously developed consensus-derived indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research. Results Of the 900 researchers who were sent a postal questionnaire, 518 responded, giving a response rate of 58%. Nine of the 15 consumers responded. Eighty-eight (17%) researchers reported involving consumers, mainly as members of a project steering group, designing research instruments and/or planning or designing the research methods. Most projects met between one and four indicators. Conclusions This national survey revealed that only a small proportion of NHS researchers were actively involving consumers. This study provides a useful marker of how far the Department of Health's policy on consumer involvement in NHS research has been implemented and in what way.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available