4.6 Article

Racial Disparities in Pediatric Access to Kidney Transplantation: Does Socioeconomic Status Play a Role?

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 369-378

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03888.x

Keywords

Access to transplantation; health insurance; kidney transplant waiting list; neighborhood poverty; pediatric kidney transplantation; racial and ethnic disparities; United States Renal Data System

Funding

  1. NIMHD NIH HHS [L60 MD007236] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Racial disparities persist in access to renal transplantation in the United States, but the degree to which patient and neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) impacts racial disparities in deceased donor renal transplantation access has not been examined in the pediatric and adolescent end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population. We examined the interplay of race and SES in a population-based cohort of all incident pediatric ESRD patients <21 years from the United States Renal Data System from 2000 to 2008, followed through September 2009. Of 8 452 patients included, 30.8% were black, 27.6% white-Hispanic, 44.3% female and 28.0% lived in poor neighborhoods. A total of 63.4% of the study population was placed on the waiting list and 32.5% received a deceased donor transplant. Racial disparities persisted in transplant even after adjustment for SES, where minorities were less likely to receive a transplant compared to whites, and this disparity was more pronounced among patients 1820 years. Disparities in access to the waiting list were mitigated in Hispanic patients with private health insurance. Our study suggests that racial disparities in transplant access worsen as pediatric patients transition into young adulthood, and that SES does not explain all of the racial differences in access to kidney transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available