4.6 Article

Urinary miR-210 as a Mediator of Acute T-Cell Mediated Rejection in Renal Allograft Recipients

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 2221-2227

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03679.x

Keywords

Acute cellular rejection; biomarker; kidney graft function; microRNA; urine

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [LO 1736/1-1]
  2. Integrated Research Center Transplantation by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [01EO0802]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small ribonucleotides regulating gene expression. Circulating miRNAs are remarkably stable in the blood. We tested whether miRNAs are also detectable in urine and may serve as new predictors of outcome in renal transplant patients with acute rejection. We profiled urinary miRNAs of stable transplant patients and transplant patients with acute rejection. The miR-10a, miR-10b and miR-210 were strongly deregulated in urine of the patients with acute rejection. We confirmed these data in urine of a validation cohort of 62 patients with acute rejection, 19 control transplant patients without rejection and 13 stable transplant patients with urinary tract infection by quantitative RT-PCR. The miR-10b and miR-210 were downregulated and miR-10a upregulated in patients with acute rejection compared to controls. Only miR-210 differed between patients with acute rejection when compared to stable transplant patients with urinary tract infection or transplant patients before/after rejection. Low miR-210 levels were associated with higher decline in GFR 1 year after transplantation. Selected miRNAs are strongly altered in urine of the patients with acute renal allograft rejection. The miR-210 levels identify patients with acute rejection and predict long-term kidney function. Urinary miR-210 may thus serve as a novel biomarker of acute kidney rejection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available