4.6 Article

Donation after Cardiac Death Liver Transplantation: Predictors of Outcome

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages 2512-2519

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03293.x

Keywords

DCD liver transplant; graft failure; outcomes; prognosis; risk factors

Funding

  1. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) [234-2005-37009C]
  2. US Department of Health and Human Services

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We aimed to identify recipient, donor and transplant risk factors associated with graft failure and patient mortality following donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver transplantation. These estimates were derived from Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from all US liver-only DCD recipients between September 1, 2001 and April 30, 2009 (n = 1567) and Cox regression techniques. Three years post-DCD liver transplant, 64.9% of recipients were alive with functioning grafts, 13.6% required retransplant and 21.6% died. Significant recipient factors predictive of graft failure included: age >= 55 years, male sex, African-American race, HCV positivity, metabolic liver disorder, transplant MELD >= 35, hospitalization at transplant and the need for life support at transplant (all, p < 0.05). Donor characteristics included age >= 50 years and weight > 100 kg (all, p < 0.005). Each hour increase in cold ischemia time (CIT) was associated with 6% higher graft failure rate (HR 1.06, p < 0.001). Donor warm ischemia time >= 35 min significantly increased graft failure rates (HR 1.84, p = 0.002). Recipient predictors of mortality were age >= 55 years, hospitalization at transplant and retransplantation (all, p < 0.006). Donor weight > 100 kg and CIT also increased patient mortality (all, p < 0.035). These findings are useful for transplant surgeons creating DCD liver acceptance protocols.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available