4.6 Article

Characterization of yellow plaques found in the small bowel during double-balloon enteroscopy

Journal

ENDOSCOPY
Volume 39, Issue 12, Pages 1059-1063

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966824

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and study aims: The aim of this study was to characterize yellow (or whitish) plaques of the small bowel that were found during double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) performed for small-bowel evaluation. Patients and methods: Patients who were being evaluated for small-bowel pathology at our institution (for a variety of indications) were included in the study. In 16 patients, DBE revealed yellow or whitish submucosal plaques, defined as small, raised, submucosal lesions that were well circumscribed and covered by normal-appearing small-bowel mucosa. Biopsy tissue obtained during the procedures was stained with hematoxylin and eosin and with periodic acid-Schiff stain, and was subjected to immunochemical testing using endothelial markers (anti-CD31 and anti-CD34). Results: These 16 patients were identified out of a total of 150 DBE procedures performed in 120 patients (eight men, eight women; mean age 62, range 33-78). The lesions were mostly single (range 1 to > 5 lesions), ranging in size from 2 mm to 15 mm, and were slightly raised (from 1 mm to 2 mm). In four cases the plaques could not be biopsied because the patient had a coagulation disorder or because the DBE was being performed to investigate severe acute bleeding. In the other 12 patients, a characteristic white-yellow liquid exudated from the biopsy site in 80% of lesions, and these 12 patients were shown to have lymphangiectasias. No association with an infiltrative disorder could be detected. Conclusions: Yellow and white submucosal plaques are found in up to 13% of patients undergoing DBE. They are most likely to be lymphangiectasias and are a normal anatomical variant. They do not require further work-up.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available