4.7 Article

Proteolytic gene expression differs at rest and after resistance exercise between young and old women

Publisher

GERONTOLOGICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/62.12.1407

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG-18409] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Skeletal muscle atrophy in rodents is associated with increased gene expression of proteolytic markers muscle-RING-finger protein 1 (MuRF-1) and atrogin-1. In humans with age-related muscle atrophy, known as sarcopenia, little is known about these key proteolytic biomarkers. Therefore, the purpose of this investigation was 2-fold: (i) measure messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of proteolytic genes MuRF-1, atrogin-1, forkhead box (FOXO)3A, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in young and old women at rest, and (ii) measure these proteolytic genes in response to an acute resistance exercise (RE) bout, a known hypertrophic stimulus. Methods. A group of old women (OW: n = 6, 85 +/- 1 years, thigh muscle = 89 +/- 4 cm(2)) and young women (YW: n = 8, 23 +/- 2 years, thigh muscle = 122 +/- 6 cm(2)) performed three sets of 10 knee extensions at 70% of one-repetition maximum. Muscle biopsies were taken from the vastus lateralis before and 4 hours after RE. Using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), mRNA was amplified and normalized to GAPDH. Results. At rest, OW expressed higher mRNA levels of MuRF-1 (p=.04) and FOXO3A (p=.001) compared to YW. In response to RE, there was an age effect (p =.01) in the induction of atrogin-1 (OW: 2.5-fold). Both YW and OW had an induction (p =.001) in MuRF-1 (YW: 3.6-fold; OW: 2.6-fold) with RE. Conclusions. These data show that the regulation of ubiquitin proteasome-related genes involved with muscle atrophy are altered in very old women (> 80 years). This finding is manifested both at rest and in response to RE, which may contribute to the large degree of muscle loss with age.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available