4.6 Article

Donor-reactive CD8 memory T cells infiltrate cardiac allografts within 24-h posttransplant in naive recipients

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 8, Issue 8, Pages 1652-1661

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02302.x

Keywords

CD8 memory T cells; graft infiltration; IFN-gamma

Funding

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI58088, R01 AI040459, R01 AI040459-11A1, R01 AI058088-01A3, R01 AI058088, AI40459] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM007250] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Normal immune responses stimulated by pathogenic and environmental antigens generate memory T cells that react with donor antigens and no currently used immunosuppressive drug completely inhibits memory T-cell function. While donor-reactive memory T cells clearly compromise graft outcomes, mechanisms utilized by memory T cells to promote rejection are largely unknown. In this study, we investigated how early endogenous memory cells infiltrate and express effector function in cardiac allografts. Endogenous CD8 memory T cells in nonsensitized recipients distinguish syngeneic versus allogeneic cardiac allografts within 24 h of reperfusion. CD8-dependent production of IFN-gamma and CXCL9/Mig was observed 24 to 72 h posttransplant in allografts but not isografts. CXCL9 was produced by donor cells in response to IFN-gamma made by recipient CD8 T cells reactive to donor class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules. Activated CD8 T cells were detected in allografts at least 3 days before donor-specific effector T cells producing IFN-gamma were detected in the recipient spleen. Early inflammation mediated by donor-reactive CD8 memory T cells greatly enhanced primed effector T-cell infiltration into allografts. These results suggest that strategies for optimal inhibition of alloimmunity should include neutralization of infiltrating CD8 memory T cells within a very narrow window after transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available