4.6 Article

Effect of teriparatide on early bone loss after kidney transplantation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages 1864-1870

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02327.x

Keywords

kidney transplantation; recombinant PTH; renal osteodystrophy

Funding

  1. the Austrian Social Insurance for Occupational Risk (AUVA
  2. the Social Health Insurance Vienna (WGKK)
  3. 'Jubilaumsfond der Osterreichischen Nationalbank' [10238]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Kidney transplantation is associated with bone loss and a high risk of fractures. Prophylactic treatment of bone is therefore recommended in the early posttransplant period. As a large number of transplant recipients develop adynamic renal osteodystrophy, recombinant parathyroid hormone (rPTH) could be a promising therapeutic option. In a 6-month double-blind, randomized trial, 26 kidney transplant recipients were treated with daily subcutaneous injections of 20 mu g teriparatide (PTH 1-34) or placebo. Bone mineral density (BMD) of the femoral neck, lumbar spine and radial bone was measured at transplantation and after 6 months. Paired bone biopsies for histomorphometric analysis were obtained in six, and for measurement of bone matrix mineralization in five patients of each group. Serologic bone markers were measured at baseline and every 3 months. A total of 24 out of 26 patients completed the study. Femoral neck BMD was stable in the teriparatide group, but decreased significantly in the placebo group. Lumbar spine and radial BMD, histomorphometric bone volume and bone matrix mineralization status remained unchanged in both groups. Serologic bone markers were similarly reduced in both groups throughout the study. We conclude that teriparatide does not improve BMD early after kidney transplantation. Neither histological analysis nor bone markers provide evidence of improved bone turnover or mineralization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available