4.6 Article

Earlier is not necessarily better in preemptive kidney transplantation

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 8, Issue 10, Pages 2071-2076

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02381.x

Keywords

delayed graft function (DGF); glomerular filtration rate; graft function; graft survival; kidney transplantation; patient survival; preemptive

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK13083]
  2. National Institutes of Health Prefaculty Training in Pediatric Nephrology [T32 DK007087-35]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While preemptive (before chronic dialysis) transplantation is associated with improved graft survival, it is unclear whether higher versus lower pretransplant kidney function is associated with even better graft survival after preemptive transplantation. We examined 671 first, preemptive, kidney-only transplantations at Hennepin County Medical Center and the University of Minnesota Medical Center 1984-2006. We estimated pretransplant glomerular filtration rate (eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m(2)) using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation with Group 1: < 10.0 (7.3 +/- 1.7, N = 324), Group 2: 10.0-14.9 (12.0 +/- 1.4, N = 217) and Group 3: >= 15.0 (21.1 +/- 10.0, N = 130). The mean difference in eGFR for Group 1 versus 3 was 13.8 pretransplant, 16.3 on day 1 and 13.9 on day 2 posttransplant. By week 1 and year 1 posttransplant, the differences between Groups 1 and 3 reduced to 6.3 and 4.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively. The adjusted relative risk (RR; Cox analysis) for graft failure was not significantly lower with higher pretransplant eGFR (reference eGFR < 10.0); RR = 0.99 (95% confidence interval = 0.68-1.44, p = 0.9432) for eGFR 10.0-14.9; RR = 1.35 (0.89-2.05, p = 0.1588) for eGFR >= 15. Thus, early preemptive transplantation with higher eGFR does not necessarily improve graft survival after kidney transplantation, compared to preemptive transplantation with lower pretransplant eGFR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available