4.4 Article

Higher tumor to benign ratio of the androgen receptor mRNA expression associates with prostate cancer progression after radical prostatectomy

Journal

UROLOGY
Volume 70, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.010

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES Alteration's of androgen receptor (AR) functions caused by overexpression, amplification, or mutation have been described in a significant Subset of advanced prostate cancer (CaP). Because AR mutations or amplification are rare in early stage CaP, we hypothesized that altered AR expression in prostate tumor cells may provide a prognostic indicator of disease progression. METHODS RNA from laser capture microdissected (LCM) tumor and benign epithelial cells from radical prostatectomy specimens of 115 hormone-naive patients were studied. Expression of AR and GAPDH genes were measured by duplex quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in 230 specimens. A ratio of the expression of AR gene, normalized to GAPDH gene expression in the same specimens, was compared in tumor and benign epithelial cells (tumor-to-benign ratio) and correlated with clinicopathologic features. RESULTS Paired t test analysis revealed a 62% lower AR expression in tumor tissue compared with benign tissue (P = 0.0005). However, multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of time to PSA recurrence revealed that higher tumor cell associated AR expression (continuous, log-transformed), significantly increases odds of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence (P = 0.0139) when controlling for age at surgery, race, time from diagnosis to surgery, risk stratification, pathologic T stage, Gleason sum, and margin status. CONCLUSIONS Quantitative determination of AR gene expression levels in prostate epithelial cells may be useful for predicting PSA recurrence. This study Supports the accumulating data suggesting that gain of AR function may contribute to CaP progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available