4.4 Article

Nucleotide variation in wild and inbred mice

Journal

GENETICS
Volume 177, Issue 4, Pages 2277-2291

Publisher

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.079988

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The house mouse is a well-established model organism, particularly for studying the genetics of complex traits. However, most studies of mice use classical inbred strains, whose genomes derive from multiple species. Relatively little is known about the distribtion of genetic variation among these species or how variation among strains relates to variation in the wild. We sequenced intronic regions of five X-linked loci in large samples of wild Mus domesticus and M. musculus, and we found low levels nucleotide diversity in both species. We compared these data to published data from shortportions of six X-linked and 18 autosomal loci in wild mice. We estimate that. M. domesticus and M. musculus diverged < 500,000 years ago. Consistent with this recent: divergence, some gene genealogies were reciprocally monophyletic between these species, while others were paraphyletic or polyphyletic. In general, the X chromosome was more differentiated than the autosomes. We resequenced classical inbred strains for all 29 loci and found that inbred strains contain only a small amount of the genetic variation seen in wild mice. Notably, the X chromosome contains proportionalely less variation among inbred strains than do the autosomes. Moreover, variation among inbred strains derives from differences between species as well as Front differences Within species, and these proportions differ in different genomic regions. Wild mice thus provide a reservoir of additional genetic variation that may be useful for mapping Studies. Together these results suggest that Mid mice will be a valuable complement to laboratory strains for studying the genetics of complex traits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available