3.8 Article

Endostatin inhibits endochondral ossification

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENE MEDICINE
Volume 9, Issue 12, Pages 1057-1064

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.1116

Keywords

endochondral ossification; ectopic osteogenesis; VEGF-A; endostatin; BMP; dual gene transfer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Angiogenesis is essential for the replacement of cartilage by bone during skeletal growth and regeneration. Vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) is a key regulator of angiogenesis whereas endostatin, a potent inhibitor of endothelial cell proliferation and migration, is a natural antagonist of VEGF-A The regulatory role of these peptides in angiogenesis and bone formation was investigated using adenoviral gene delivery of VEGF-A and endostatin in a mouse ectopic ossification model. Methods Bone formation was induced in the hamstring muscles of adult mice with native bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) extract implemented in gelatine gel together with VEGF-A and endostatin recombinant adenoviral vectors. The mice were sacrificed 1, 2, and 3 weeks after the operation and ectopic bone formation was followed radiographically and histologically. Results Significant bone formation was induced by BMP extract in all treatment groups. VEGF-A stimulated and endostatin prevented the formation of FVIII-related antigen-positive vessels as well as the number of cartilage-resorbing chondroclasts/osteoclasts. Endostatin alone or in conjugation with VEGF-A reduced bone formation. Excess of VEGF-A stimulated and endostatin reduced bone formation, respectively, at the 3-week time point. Conclusions Our findings indicate that endostatin retards the cartilage phase in endochondral ossification which subsequently reduces bone formation in our experimental model. We conclude that bone growth and healing, which share features with ectopic bone formation, may be regulated by endostatin. Copyright (C) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available