4.2 Article

Chronological changes of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets in the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, a mouse model of multiple sclerosis

Journal

TOHOKU JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
Volume 213, Issue 4, Pages 329-339

Publisher

TOHOKU UNIV MEDICAL PRESS
DOI: 10.1620/tjem.213.329

Keywords

EAE/MS; MHC; CD4; CD8; IL-17

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS). The etiology of MS remains unclear, but T cells specific for myelin components, such as myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG), are thought to play a critical role in the onset of MS. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) has been used as an animal model of MS, and T helper type 1 (Th1) cells play an essential role for the pathogenesis of EAE through the production of Th1 cytokines, interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and tumor necrosis factor-a (TNF-alpha). We examined CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses in the spleen and CNS of EAE mice, generated by immunization with a peptide (35-55 amino acid residues) of MOG. The number of both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and their MOG-reactivity in the CNS were associated with increasing disease severity but not those in the spleen, suggesting that the MOG-specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in the CNS are involved in the development of EAE. Polymerase chain reaction analysis suggested that both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells produced IFN-gamma and TNF-a, while CD4(+) T cells also produced interleukin- 17 (IL- 17), an important factor in the development of EAE. Thus, CD4(+) T cells may contribute to the induction of EAE by producing IL-17. Furthermore, CD8(+) T cells express higher levels of a suppressive cytokine, IL-10. Taking together, our data suggest that CD4(+) T cells are involved in the early phase of EAE, whereas CD8(+) T cells have a regulatory role in the later stage of EAE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available