4.1 Article

Regulation of financial conflicts of interest in medical practice and medical research - a damaging solution in search of a problem

Journal

PERSPECTIVES IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 50, Issue 1, Pages 54-71

Publisher

JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1353/pbm.2007.0011

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The free market, which includes most practicing physicians, publicly supported biomedical researchers, and private drug and device companies, has succeeded spectacularly in delivering new medical technologies to the public. Increased interactions between doctors (physicians and biomedical researchers), epitomized by the founding of the biotechnology revolution, have and can continue to accelerate this delivery. A powerful anti-commercial advocacy movement that has blossomed over the past 20 years threatens this momentum. This movement has succeeded in inverting reality by demonizing the market and by promoting distorted and damaging views of professionalism and of science. Most ominously, it has imposed onerous and counterproductive regulations on medical education and translational research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available