4.1 Article

Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular function prior to and 6 months after renal transplantation

Journal

TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS
Volume 39, Issue 10, Pages 3159-3162

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.06.083

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a successful kidney transplantation on left ventricular functional parameters that can be measured with gated-single photon emission computed tomography (gated-SPECT) myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with end-stage renal disease. Materials and Methods. Thirty-two consecutive patients (22 male) who had undergone a successful kidney transplantation in whom gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion scintigraphy was performed prior to and 6 months after surgery were included. Functional parameters, such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), wall motion, and wall thickening, were calculated with quantitative gated-SPECT. Results. The mean LVEF improved significantly (P <.001) from 52% (SD +/- 11) before to 63% (SD +/- 10) after renal transplantation. This was attributable to a significant improvement in the end-systolic volume (P =.028). Wall motion and wall thickening improved in almost all myocardial segments. We found a significant correlation between the levels of urea and creatinine and the LVEF. However, correlations between an increase in the LVEF and the improvement in urea (P =.30) and creatinine (P =.26) levels were not significant, which is probably related to the number of patients studied. Conclusion. The systolic left ventricular dysfunction in terms of LVEF, wall motion, and wall thickening improves significantly 6 months after kidney transplantation in patients with end-stage kidney disease. Long-term follow-up is required to establish the prognostic value of these findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available