4.7 Article

Identification of potential gene markers and insights into the pathophysiology of pheochromocytoma malignancy

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 92, Issue 12, Pages 4865-4872

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2007-1253

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Pheochromocytomas are catecholamine-producing tumors that are generally benign but that can also present as or develop into malignancy. Occurrence of malignant pheochromocytomas can only be asserted by imaging of metastatic lesions. Objectives: We conducted a gene expression profiling of benign and malignant tumors to identify a gene signature that would allow us to discriminate benign from malignant pheochromocytomas and to gain a better understanding of tumorigenic pathways associated with malignancy. Design: A total of 36 patients with pheochromocytoma was studied retrospectively. There were 18 ( nine benign and nine malignant) tumors used for gene expression profiling on pangenomic oligonucleotide microarrays. Results: We identified and validated a set of predictor genes that could accurately distinguish the two tumor subtypes through unsupervised clustering. Most of the differentially expressed genes were down-regulated in malignant tumors, and several of these genes encoded neuroendocrine factors involved in prominent characteristics of chromaffin cell biology. In particular, the expression of two key processing enzymes of trophic peptides, peptidylglycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase and glutaminyl-peptide cyclotransferase, was reduced in malignant pheochromocytomas. Conclusion: The gene expression profiling of benign and malignant pheochromocytomas clearly identified a set of genes that could be used as a prognostic multi-marker and revealed that the expression of several genes encoding neuroendocrine proteins was reduced in malignant compared with benign tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available