4.7 Article

Meta analysis: cancer risk in Barrett's oesophagus

Journal

ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 26, Issue 11-12, Pages 1465-1477

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03528.x

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Risk of cancer in Barrett's oesophagus is reported to vary between studies and also between countries, where the studies were conducted as per several systematic reviews. Cancer incidence has implications on surveillance strategies. Aim To perform a meta-analysis to determine the incidence of oesophageal cancer in Barrett's oesophagus. Methods Articles retrieved by MEDLINE search (English language, 1966-2004). Studies had to necessarily include verified Barrett's oesophagus surveillance patients, documented follow-up and cancer identified as the outcome measure. A random effects model of meta-analysis was chosen and results were expressed as mean (95% CI). Results Forty-one articles selected for conventional Barrett's oesophagus (length > 3 cm); eight included short segment Barrett's oesophagus (one additional article including only short segment Barrett's oesophagus). Cancer incidence was 7/1000 (6-9) person-years duration of follow-up (pyd), with no detectable geographical variation [UK 7/1000 (4-12) pyd, USA 7/1000 (5-9) pyd and Europe 8/1000 (5-12) pyd]. Cancer incidence in the UK was 10/1000 (7-14), when two large studies were excluded. Cancer incidence in SSBO was 6/1000 (3-12) pyd. When short segment Barrett's oesophagus compared to conventional Barrett's oesophagus, there was a trend towards reduced cancer risk [OR 0.55, (95% CI: 0.19-1.6), P = 0.25]. Conclusion We found no geographical variations in Barrett's oesophagus cancer risk, but observed a trend towards reduced cancer risk in short segment Barrett's oesophagus. There is a time trend of decreasing cancer incidence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available