4.3 Article

Sleeping hearts: the role of the heart in sleeping sickness (human African trypanosomiasis)

Journal

TROPICAL MEDICINE & INTERNATIONAL HEALTH
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages 1422-1432

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2007.01948.x

Keywords

human African trypanosomiasis; ECG findings; brain natriuretic peptide; cardiopathy; troponin

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES To estimate the frequency and evolution of heart involvement in human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) using electrocardiogram (ECG) findings; to describe these findings and to assess the frequency and clinical relevance of symptoms and signs before and after treatment. METHODS In a prospective cohort study ECG findings, signs and symptoms consistent with heart failure and cardiac laboratory parameters were studied at baseline, 2 days after the end of treatment and 3 months later. RESULTS Major ECG alterations were significantly more frequent in HAT patients than in healthy controls (71% vs. 18%; P < 0.001); 31% were low voltage changes, 34% were repolarization changes. ECG signs of necrosis and conduction problems were rare. Symptoms consistent with heart failure such as exertional dyspnoea (19% vs. 1.7%; P = 0.002) or palpitations (18% vs. 5%; P = 0.28) occurred more frequently in patients than in controls. The median NT-proBNP was significantly higher in HAT patients than in controls (85.2 vs. 28 pg/ml; P < 0.001). Troponin levels were normal. At the end of treatment repolarization changes appeared or worsened in 33.4%. Such changes improved or disappeared at follow-up in 33.1% of the patients. CONCLUSION Cardiac involvement documented by ECG alterations is common in HAT patients, but cardiopathy rarely causes severe congestive heart failure and subsides after treatment. ECG alterations immediately after treatment and their improvement 3 months later may be the result of a treatment-induced inflammatory reaction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available