4.7 Article

Modulation of cardiac autonomic functions in patients with major depression treated with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 104, Issue 1-3, Pages 231-236

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2007.04.002

Keywords

major depression; autonomic functions; heart rate variability; sympathovagal balance; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Sub clinical cardiac autonomic imbalance is associated with depression. Clinical improvement produced by antidepressant therapy might alter this autonomic balance. Objectives: To investigate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy on autonomic functions measured by heart rate variability (HRV) in depression patients and compare it with selective serotonin re-up-take inhibitors (SSRI) therapy. Methods: Consecutive drug-naive patients of major depression based on DSM-IV-TR were recruited in this study (n = 67). Basal Hamilton depression-rating scale (HDRS) and measures of cardiac autonomic function were recorded and compared with those after two weeks of therapy with rTMS (n = 27) and one month after SSRI therapy (n = 25). Results: Both therapies produced comparable and significant reduction in HDRS scores. HRV measures indicated that rTMS produced significantly greater reduction in the sympathetic: parasympathetic ratio suggesting improvement in sympathovagal balance. Conventional cardiac autonomic function tests did not differentiate the two therapy effects. Conclusions: rTMS not only produced antidepressant effects but also corrected the autonomic imbalance. SSRI was systemically administered and hence by direct cardiac effect, may have masked cardiac effects that would have occurred by the improvement in depression. Alternatively, the neurophysiological correction with drug therapy may have longer latency, just as with the therapeutic effects. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available