4.4 Article

A coil system for real-time magnetic fluid hyperthermia microscopy studies

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 112-120

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/02656736.2015.1104732

Keywords

Alternating magnetic field; magnetic fluid hyperthermia; magnetic nanoparticles; nanoactuation; radio frequency; time lapse imaging

Funding

  1. nanoTherics Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: We describe the design and application of a new apparatus for applying Radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic fields to cells in culture on a microscope stage. This new design enables real-time studies of the actuation of magnetic nanoparticles bound to membrane receptors or internalised within cells together with the study of magnetic fluid hyperthermia (MFH)-associated effects. Materials and methods: RF coils were fabricated and electromagnetic simulations were performed along with compatibility evaluations and calorimetric experiments using this apparatus at discreet frequencies between 100 kHz and 1 MHz. Cell killing via MFH was investigated in a neuroblastoma tumour cell line. Results: Simulations and evaluations showed that the field intensity and homogeneity experienced by the cells within the chamber is best with a planar coil configuration. The incubation chamber was suitable for cell culture and the design was compatible with mountings on different makes of microscopes as it mimics a standard 96/24/6 tissue-culture well plate. Successful calorimetric and MFH cytotoxicity proof-of-principle experiments were performed and are presented. Conclusions: We conclude from these experiments that alternating magnetic field (AMF)-mediated activation and magnetic fluid hyperthermia (MFH) research will benefit from this RF coil that fits inside an incubation chamber, mounted onto a microscope. This new design could be used to assist real-time MFH studies in vitro.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available