4.5 Article

Immunosafety Evaluation of a Multilayer Flat-Plate Bioartificial Liver

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES
Volume 343, Issue 6, Pages 429-434

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e318232ae0a

Keywords

Bioartificial liver; Acute liver failure; Safety

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30772129]
  2. International Cooperation Program awarded by MOST of China [2008DFA51180]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: To study and evaluate the immunosafety of our newly developed multilayer flat-plate bioartificial liver (BAL) in treatment of canines with acute liver failure. Methods: Fresh porcine hepatocytes and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells were cocultured in new BAL. Ten canine models with acute liver failure were set up through D-galactosamine administration; 24 hours after administration, the beagles were randomly allocated to a 6-hour treatment with the BAL. The beagles were divided into 2 groups by treatment times. Group 1 beagles (n = 5) received a single BAL treatment. Group 2 beagles (n = 5) received 3 BAL treatments. The hemodynamic, hematologic response and humoral immune responses to BAL therapy were studied before and after treatments. Results: All beagles remained hemodynamically and hematologically stable during BAL treatments. The levels of IgG and IgM were similar before and after treatment after a single treatment. In addition, the level of CH50 in group 1 slightly decreased after the initiation of BAL treatment, and then the level recovered to baseline quickly after treatments. Time-course changes of the levels of antibodies and CH50 after 3 treatments in group 2 were similar to group 1. Only trace levels of IgG were detected in BAL medium after treatments. Conclusion: The multilayer flat-plate BAL showed a great immunosafety in the treatment of canines with acute liver failure and exhibited a good prospect of its use in clinic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available