4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

A complete and irreducible dynamic SGS heat-flux modelling based on the strain rate tensor for large-eddy simulation of thermal convection

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 1227-1243

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2007.06.001

Keywords

turbulence; heat transfer; convection; large-eddy simulation; subgrid-scale model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a general family of explicit algebraic tensor diffusivity functions based on the resolved temperature gradient vector and strain rate tensor is studied and applied to the construction of new constitutive relations for modelling the subgrid-scale (SGS) heat flux (HF). Based on Noll's formulation, dynamic linear and nonlinear tensor diffusivity models are proposed for large-eddy simulation of thermal convection. The constitutive relations for these two proposed models are complete and irreducible. These two new models include several existing dynamic SGS HF models as special cases. It is shown that in contrast to the conventional modelling approach, the proposed models embody more degrees of freedom, permit non-alignment between the SGS HF and resolved temperature gradient vectors, reflect near-wall flow physics at the subgrid scale, and therefore, allow for a more realistic geometrical representation of the SGS heat flux for large-eddy simulation of thermal convection. Numerical simulations have been performed using a benchmark test case of a combined forced and natural convective flow in a vertical channel with a Reynolds number of Re-tau(a) = 150 and a Grashof number of Gr = 9.6 x 10(5). The results obtained using the two proposed SGS HF models are compared with reported direct numerical simulation (DNS) data as well as predictions obtained using several conventional dynamic SGS HF models. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available