4.5 Article

Environmental Air Pollution Has Decremental Effects on Pulmonary Function Test Parameters Up to One Week After Exposure

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES
Volume 338, Issue 4, Pages 273-279

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181adb3ed

Keywords

Air pollution; Pulmonary function testing; Particulate matter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Recent exposure to air pollution has a decremental effect on pulmonary function. This short-term effect has only been studied for up to a few days postexposure. Our objective was to analyze the effect of air pollution on spirometric parameters in varying lag times of up to I week from the time of exposure. Methods: Healthy subjects, never smokers, who were participants in the Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center Inflammation Survey held between 2002 and 2007, were included if residing within an 11-km range to the nearest air pollution monitoring station. Linear regression models were applied to each lung function variable [first second of exhalation (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC] against air pollutant variables (particulate matter under 10 mu in diameter, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, and ozone) for increasing lag periods of up to 7 days, and they were adjusted for possible confounders that affect air pollution and spirometric measurements. Results: The study Population comprised 2380 individuals. We found a statistically significant negative correlation between air pollutants, mainly SO2, and between FEV1 and FVC. This effect was significant from days 3 to 6, with a maximal effect noted for the fifth day and for the 7-day average before pulmonary function measurement. No significant change was found for FEV1/FVC ratio, Conclusions: Air pollution has a decremental effect oil lung function parameters for tip to 6 days after exposure in healthy adults. SO2 emerged as the most significant air pollutant affecting short-term lung function parameters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available