4.4 Article

Antigen stimulation induces HIV envelope gp120-specific CD4+ T cells to secrete CCR5 ligands and suppress HIV infection

Journal

VIROLOGY
Volume 369, Issue 1, Pages 214-225

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.07.031

Keywords

HIV; CD4 T lymphocytes; chemokines; HIV envelope gp120; CCR5 ligands

Categories

Funding

  1. FIC NIH HHS [D43 TW001409] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-27742, R01 AI048371, AI-48371, P30 AI027742, R01 AI048371-06] Funding Source: Medline
  3. PHS HHS [D43 TWO1409] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CD4(+) T cells are critical for effective immune responses against HIV, but they are also the main cell type targeted by the virus. To investigate the key factors that could protect these cells from infection, we evaluated the capacity of HIV gp120-specific human CD4(+) T cells to produce chemokines that inhibit HIV and determined their contribution in suppressing infection in the cells. Antigen stimulation of the CD4(+) T cells elicited production of high amounts of CCR5 chemokines MIP-1 alpha (CCL3), MIP-1 beta (CCL4), and RANTES (CCL5). Production of these CCR5 ligands was more readily and reproducibly detected than that of IFN-gamma or IL-2. Importantly, in association with secretion of the CCR5 ligands, antigen stimulation made these CD4(+) T cells more resistant to CCR5-tropic HIV-1. Conversely, in the absence of antigen stimulation, the cells were readily infected by the virus, and after infection, their capacity to produce MIP-1 beta and IFN-gamma rapidly declined. Thus, vaccines that trigger HIV-specific CD4(+) T cells to elicit robust and rapid production of anti-viral chemokines would be advantageous. Such responses would protect virus-specific CD4(+) T cells from HIV infection and preserve their critical functions in mounting and maintaining long-lasting immunity against the virus. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available