4.5 Article

Biopsy-site Changes in Lung Adenocarcinoma With Prior Core Needle Biopsy A Potential Pitfall in the Assessment of Stromal Invasion

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 443-446

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182744a25

Keywords

lung biopsy; core needle biopsy; biopsy-site changes; needle tract; lung; adenocarcinoma; adenocarcinoma in situ

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although biopsy-site changes are known to cause diagnostic difficulties in thyroid and breast specimens, especially when assessing invasion, such changes have not been described in the lung. Assessment of invasion is important in lung cancers to distinguish bronchioloalveolar carcinoma [adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)] from invasive adenocarcinoma. The aim of this study was to determine whether biopsy-site changes occur in the lung and whether they may impact this differential diagnosis. Lobectomy specimens were examined from patients whose previous core needle biopsies showed well-differentiated adenocarcinoma with a lepidic pattern. There were 26 adenocarcinomas, including 14 minimally invasive adenocarcinomas, 2 invasive well-differentiated adenocarcinomas, and 10 AISs. Biopsy-site changes were identified in 9 of 26 (35%), including 4 minimally invasive adenocarcinomas, 3 AISs, and 2 well-differentiated adenocarcinomas. The interval between biopsy and resection ranged from 12 to 45 days (mean, 26.1 d). The biopsy sites consisted of a linear scar composed of collagen and plump fibroblasts, ranging from 2.0 to 13.1mm in length and 0.5 to 1.6mm in width. Scattered lymphocytes and plasma cells were present in 8 cases, pigment-laden macrophages in 4, and foreign body giant cells in 3. Benign entrapped lung epithelium was present within the scar in all 9 and entrapped malignant epithelium in 4. Biopsy-site changes can be identified in a significant proportion of lung tumors after core needle biopsy. They need to be distinguished from tumor-related stromal reactions that are considered an indication of invasion and are important in the differentiation of AIS and invasive adenocarcinoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available