4.5 Article

Pancreatic innervation in mouse development and β-cell regeneration

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 150, Issue 3, Pages 592-602

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2007.09.079

Keywords

pancreas regeneration; development; maturation; sympathetic innervation; sensory; astroglia

Categories

Funding

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK60533, R01 DK060533-04, R01 DK060533-05, R01 DK060533] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIGMS NIH HHS [R25 GM56847, R25 GM056847] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pancreatic innervation is being viewed with increasing interest with respect to pancreatic disease. At the same time, relatively little is currently known about innervation dynamics during development and disease. The present study employs confocal microscopy to analyze the growth and development of sympathetic and sensory neurons and astroglia during pancreatic organogenesis and maturation. Our research reveals that islet innervation is closely linked to the process of islet maturation-neural cell bodies undergo intrapancreatic migration/shuff ling in tandem with endocrine cells, and close neuro-endocrine contacts are established quite early in pancreatic development. In addition, we have assayed the effects of large-scale P-cell loss and repopulation on the maintenance of islet innervation with respect to particular neuron types. We demonstrate that depletion of the 13-cell population in the rat insulin promoter (RIp)-cmyc(ER) mouse line has cell-type-specific effects on postganglionic sympathetic neurons and pancreatic astroglia. This study contributes to a greater understanding of how cooperating physiological systems develop together and coordinate their functions, and also helps to elucidate how permutation of one organ system through stress or disease can specifically affect parallel systems in an organism. (c) 2007 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available