4.5 Article

NKX2.2 is a Useful Immunohistochemical Marker for Ewing Sarcoma

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 7, Pages 993-999

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e31824ee43c

Keywords

Ewing sarcoma; NKX2.2; immunohistochemistry; diagnosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ewing sarcoma is a high-grade round cell sarcoma that affects bones and soft tissues in children and young adults. Its diagnosis can be challenging, and the differential diagnoses include a wide variety of small round cell tumors. CD99 and FLI-1 are the currently accepted immunohistochemical markers for Ewing sarcoma, but their accuracy has been controversial. NKX2.2 is a homeodomain-containing transcription factor that plays a critical role in neuroendocrine/glial differentiation. The NKX2.2 gene was recently identified as a target of EWS-FLI-1, the fusion protein specific to Ewing sarcoma, and was shown to be differentially upregulated in Ewing sarcoma on the basis of array-based gene expression analysis. However, the immunohistochemical diagnostic potential of this marker has not been tested. We immunostained representative sections of 30 genetically confirmed Ewing sarcomas and 130 non-Ewing small round cell tumors by using an antibody to NKX2.2. Nuclear staining in at least 5% of the cells was deemed positive. Twenty-eight (93%) of the 30 Ewing sarcomas were positive for NKX2.2. The staining was diffuse (> 50%) in all the positive cases and was moderate or strong in intensity for most cases (25 of 28). NKX2.2 was also positive in 14 non-Ewing tumors, including all the olfactory neuroblastomas and a minor subset of small cell carcinomas, synovial sarcomas, mesenchymal chondrosarcomas, and malignant melanomas. All the other non-Ewing tumors tested were negative for this marker. NKX2.2 is a valuable marker for Ewing sarcoma, with a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 89%, and aids in the differential diagnosis of small round cell tumors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available