4.6 Article

Defined protein and animal component-free NSO fed-batch culture

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 98, Issue 6, Pages 1183-1194

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bit.21509

Keywords

NSO cells; protein-free medium; fed-batch culture; cholesterol; vitamins

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A chemically defined protein and animal component-free fed-batch process for an NS0 cell line producing a human IgG(1) antibody has been developed. The fed-batch feed profile was optimised in a stepwise manner. Depletion of measurable compounds was determined by direct analysis. The cellular need for nonmeasurable compounds was tested by continued culturing of cell suspension, removed from the bioreactor, in shake-flasks supplemented with critical substances. In the final fed-batch culture, 8.4 x 10(6) viable cells mL(-1) and 625 mg antibody L-1 was obtained as compared to 2.3 X 10(6) cells mL(-1) and 70 mg antibody L-1 in batch. The increase in cell density, in combination with a prolonged declining phase where antibody formation continued, resulted in a 6-fold increase in total cell yield, a 10.5-fold increase 6.2 in viable cell hours and an 11.4-fold increase in product yield. These improvements were obtained by using a feed with glucose, glutamine, amino acids, lipids, sodium selenite, ethanolamine and vitamins. Specifically, supplementation with lipids (cholesterol) had a drastic effect on the maximum viable cell density. Calcium, magnesium and potassium were not depleted and a feed also containing iron, lithium, manganese, phosphorous and zinc did not i significantly enhance the cell yield. The growth and death profiles in the final fed-batch indicated that nutrient deprivation was not the main cause of cell death. The ammonium concentration and the osmolality increased to potentially inhibitory levels, but an imbalance in the supply of growth/survival factors may also contribute to termination of the culture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available