4.7 Article

Hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index as an outcome predictor for patients with acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: combined FHCRC and MDACC experiences

Journal

BLOOD
Volume 110, Issue 13, Pages 4606-4613

Publisher

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2007-06-096966

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA78902, P01 CA018029, CA18029, CA15704, P30 CA015704, P01 CA078902] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [K99 HL088021, HL088021, R00 HL088021] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (HCT-Cl) was effective in predicting outcomes among patients with hematologic malignancies who underwent HCT at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC). Here, we compared the performance of the HCT-Cl to 2 other indices and then tested its capacity to predict outcomes among 2 cohorts of patients diagnosed with a single disease entity, acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission, who underwent transplantation at either FHCRC or M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). FHCRC patients less frequently had unfavorable cytogenetics (15% versus 36%) and HCT-Cl scores of 3 or more (21% versus 58%) compared with MDACC patients. We found that the HCT-Cl had higher sensitivity and outcome predictability compared with the other indices among both cohorts. HCT-Cl scores of 0, 1 to 2, and 3 or more predicted comparable nonrelapse mortality (NRM) among FHCRC and MDACC patients. In multivariate models, HCT-Cl scores were associated with the highest hazard ratios (HRS) for NRM and survival among each cohort. The 2-year survival rates among FHCRC and MDACC patients were 71% versus 56%, respectively. After adjustment for risk factors, including HCT-Cl scores, no difference in survival was detected (HR: 0.98, P = .94). The HCT-Cl is a sensitive and informative tool for comparing trial results at different institutions. Inclusion of comorbidity data in HCT trials provides valuable, independent information.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available